AI Future Learning Lab Term 4 Kit · Report comments
The Term 4 Kit · Guide 2 · Report comments

Report comments without the late nights.

A privacy-safe method for drafting report comments with AI. You build a de-identified comment bank in your own voice, then personalise every comment yourself, offline. No student's name or personal information goes into an AI tool at any point.

Student data in AI
None
Placeholders only, personalised offline
Your voice
Kept
The bank is built from your own writing style
Tools
Any
Whichever AI tool your school has approved
Final say
Yours
Every comment checked by you before it goes in
The rule this guide rests on

Nothing that identifies a student goes into an AI tool. Ever.

The AI never sees your students. It helps you write a bank of well-phrased, de-identified comment templates. You match templates to students and add the personal detail yourself, in your school's reporting system or a document on your school device. Families are reading your professional judgement, so the judgement stays with you.

Before you start

Check your school's policy first.

Schools handle AI in reporting differently. Some allow AI for drafting, some require you to disclose that you used it, and some don't allow it for reports at all. Follow your school's policy on AI tools. If your school doesn't allow AI for reporting, the descriptor lists in Step 1 still work as a manual template. Where AI is allowed, use the tool your school or system has approved.

The method is designed around the privacy, transparency and accountability principles in the Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools: personal information stays out, use is disclosed where your school requires it, and the teacher is responsible for every word.

Never goes into an AI tool

  • Names, nicknames, initials or student ID numbers
  • Dates of birth, addresses or photos
  • Work samples showing a name or identifying detail
  • Health, medical, disability or diagnosis information, or learning plans
  • Wellbeing, behaviour or attendance records
  • Family circumstances, or anything a family told you in confidence
  • Any mix of details that could point to one student, like "the new student from Albany who joined in Term 3"

Fine to use, in your approved tool

  • Your school's reporting guidelines and word limits
  • Rubric criteria and achievement standard wording
  • Descriptor lists: achievement bands, strengths, next steps and dispositions
  • Invented or de-identified profiles built only from those lists
  • Old comments of yours, once names, pronouns and identifying details are removed
The method

Four steps, then a final check.

01
Define your descriptors
Short option lists for achievement, strengths, next steps and disposition. Each option describes learning in your subject.
02
Capture your voice
The AI studies a few of your old comments, fully de-identified, so the bank sounds like you.
03
Generate the bank
Sentences and full comment variants, with [Name] and [they] placeholders and gaps for real examples.
04
Personalise offline
Close the AI tool. Match, personalise and check every comment in your school's own system.
Step 1 · About 20 minutes per subject

Write your descriptor lists.

A strong report comment usually covers four things. For each subject, write a short list of options for each one. Take them from your rubric, the achievement standard and your school's reporting guidelines. They describe learning, so they contain nothing about any individual student.

DescriptorWhat it coversExample options · Year 5 English
Achievement bandThe grade or level, in your school's wordingYour school's scale, e.g. A to E, with the wording your school uses for each grade
Strengths (pick two)Skills the student shows well, from your rubricReads aloud fluently and with expression · Uses evidence from the text to support ideas · Builds on others' ideas in discussion · Chooses precise vocabulary in writing
Next step (pick one)One specific, achievable goalPlan longer pieces and organise ideas into paragraphs · Proofread for punctuation · Explain reasoning with examples from the text
Learning dispositionHow the student approaches learningPersists with challenging tasks · Works steadily and asks for help when needed · Organised and ready to learn · Works well with others in groups

Keep strengths and next steps specific to the learning area. "Works hard" describes a disposition, so it belongs in the last row.

Then, offline, note a profile for each student using only the lists, for example C · fluency + discussion · paragraphs · works steadily. The sheet that links profiles to names stays on your school device. It never goes into the AI tool.

Check before you move on

  • Every option comes from your rubric, the achievement standard or your school's guidelines.
  • Nothing on the lists describes a particular student.
  • The student-to-profile sheet is saved offline, on your school device.
Step 2 · About 10 minutes

Teach the AI how you write.

Families know your voice, so the comments should sound like you. Take two or three comments you've written before and de-identify them properly first. Replace names with [Name] and pronouns with [they], [their] or [them]. Then remove anything specific enough to identify the student, such as an event, a family detail or a health matter.

Prompt · Capture your style
Here are three report comments I've written in the past. I've replaced names with [Name] and pronouns with [they], [their] and [them], and removed any identifying details.

[paste de-identified comment 1]

[paste de-identified comment 2]

[paste de-identified comment 3]

Describe my writing style in five dot points: sentence length, tone, how I open a comment, how I phrase next steps, and words or phrases I use often. Don't rewrite the comments.

Check before you move on

  • The comments you pasted had names, pronouns and every identifying detail removed.
  • The style summary sounds like you. Correct anything that doesn't, then save it with your descriptor lists.
Step 3 · 30 to 45 minutes

Generate the bank, placeholders only.

There are two ways to build the bank. A sentence bank gives you interchangeable sentences for every descriptor, which you assemble offline. It covers a whole class quickly. Full comment variants give you complete drafts for one profile, which helps with trickier combinations.

One grammar tip before you start: if the AI writes "[they] have", swapping in "she" breaks the sentence. The prompts below ask it to write so that any pronoun fits.

Prompt A · Sentence bank
You're helping me build a report comment bank for [subject], [year level].

My school's reporting guidelines: [e.g. 60 to 80 words per comment, positive framing, strengths before next steps, plain language, phrases to avoid: ...]

My writing style: [paste the five dot points from Step 2]

Write a sentence bank using these descriptor lists:
Achievement bands: [paste]
Strengths: [paste]
Next steps: [paste]
Learning dispositions: [paste]

For each option, write two alternative sentences in my style.

Rules:
- Use [Name] for the student's name and [they], [their] and [them] for pronouns
- Write so that swapping in he, she or they won't break the grammar. For example, prefer "[Name] has" over "[they] have"
- Don't invent specific events, results or work samples. Where a specific example would help, leave a gap like [example]
- Frame next steps positively, as the next thing to work on
Prompt B · Full comment variants
Using my guidelines and writing style, write three different comment variants for this profile:

Achievement: [band]
Strength 1: [strength]
Strength 2: [strength]
Next step: [next step]
Learning disposition: [disposition]

Use the same placeholder and grammar rules as before. Keep each variant within [word limit] words. Only use what is in the profile: don't add any other claims about the student. Make the three variants clearly different in structure, so students with the same profile don't end up with identical comments.

Check before you move on

  • Every sentence uses placeholders. No names crept in.
  • Nothing claims more than the descriptor says. Delete invented specifics.
  • The tone matches your school's guidelines and your own voice.
  • You've saved the bank in a document. Next semester you only update it.
Worked example

One invented profile, start to finish.

This profile is made up for illustration. It describes no real student.

1 · The profile that goes into the AI (Prompt B)
Subject
Year 5 English · 80-word limit
Achievement
At the expected standard (C)
Strength 1
Reads aloud fluently and with expression
Strength 2
Contributes thoughtful ideas to class discussion
Next step
Plan longer written pieces and organise ideas into paragraphs
Disposition
Works steadily and asks for help when needed
2 · One of the three AI drafts

[Name] has achieved the expected standard in English this semester. [Name] reads aloud fluently and with expression, and brings thoughtful ideas to class discussions, often building on what others have said. A next step is to plan longer pieces of writing before starting, organising ideas into clear paragraphs. [Name] works steadily, asks for help when it's needed and uses feedback well, such as [example].

  • Spot the problem: the highlighted phrases aren't in the profile. The AI added them. Delete them unless they're true of this student.
  • The [example] gap is where your own knowledge of the student goes.
3 · After the teacher's edit, offline, in the reporting system

[Name] has achieved the expected standard in English this semester. [Name] reads aloud fluently and with expression, and brings thoughtful ideas to class discussions. A next step is to plan longer pieces of writing before starting, organising ideas into clear paragraphs. [Name] works steadily and asks for help when needed, and this term that helped [them] complete a full persuasive letter for the first time.

  • The two invented claims are gone.
  • The gap is filled with something the teacher actually saw (made up here, for the example).
  • 65 words, inside the limit. Strengths come first and the next step is framed positively.
  • The name and pronouns go in last, inside the reporting system. The AI tool only ever saw placeholders.
Step 4 · Offline

Personalise it yourself.

Now close the AI tool. In your school's reporting system, or a document on your school device, match each student to their profile, choose a comment and make it theirs.

  1. Swap in the name and pronouns, then reread each sentence to make sure the grammar still works.
  2. Fill every [example] gap with something specific you saw this student do.
  3. Change anything that doesn't fit what you know about this student. The template is a starting point, and your knowledge of the student decides the final wording.
  4. Vary the wording for students who share a profile, especially siblings and close friends whose families may compare reports.

Want a second opinion on tone? Use this on a template before you personalise it, while it still only has placeholders.

Prompt · Tone check, templates only
Check this comment template against my school's reporting guidelines:
[paste guidelines]

[paste the template, still with [Name] and the other placeholders]

Flag anything that is negative-first, vague, full of jargon or over [number] words. Suggest fixes in my style. Don't add any new claims about the student.
The final check

Before any comment is submitted.

Print this list or keep it open beside your reporting system.

Accuracy

  • The comment matches the grade and your evidence for this student.
  • Every claim is true of this student. Anything the AI added that isn't true has been removed.
  • Every placeholder and [example] gap is filled, and the grammar works after the pronoun swap.

Tone and framing

  • Strengths come first and are specific to the learning area.
  • The next step is clear, achievable and framed positively.
  • Plain language a family will understand, with no jargon.

School requirements

  • Within your school's word or character limit. Check how your reporting system counts.
  • Follows your school's reporting guidelines, including required and banned phrases.
  • Follows your school's policy on AI tools, including any requirement to disclose AI use.

Final read

  • Students with the same profile have comments that read differently.
  • You've read each comment aloud once. If it doesn't sound like you, change it.
  • It goes through your school's usual proofreading process.
For school leaders

Want every teacher writing reports this way?

Our 90-minute staff session teaches this method on your approved tools, so every teacher follows the same student data rule before report season. Priced to your school, quoted within 48 hours of a 30-minute call.

See staff PD options · Book a 30-minute call

Next in your kit

25 more ways to win back time this term.

The Teacher Pattern Pack: 25 copy-paste prompts for planning, differentiation, feedback, parent emails and assessment.

Did a colleague send you this? Get the whole Term 4 Kit free